Testing Paternalism: Cash vs. In-kind Transfers in Rural Mexico
نویسندگان
چکیده
Welfare programs are often implemented in-kind to promote outcomes that might not be realized under cash transfers. I use a randomized controlled trial of the Mexican governments Food Assistance Program (PAL) to test whether this form of paternalism is necessary, comparing precisely measured consumption and health outcomes under both inkind food and cash transfers. Importantly, I nd that households do not indulge in the consumption of vices when handed cash. Furthermore, there is little evidence that the in-kind food transfer induced more food to be consumed than did an equal-valued cash transfer. This result is partly explained by the fact that the in-kind transfer was inframarginal in terms of total food. However, the PAL in-kind basket contained 10 individual items, and these transfers indeed altered the types of food consumed for some households. While this distorting e¤ect of in-kind transfers must be a motivation for paternalism, I nd that households receiving cash consumed equally nutritious foods. Finally, there were few di¤erences in child nutritional intakes, and no di¤erences in child height, weight, sickness, or anemia prevalence. While other justi cations for in-kind transfers may certainly apply, there is minimal evidence supporting the paternalistic one in this context. Keywords: In-kind transfers, Paternalism, Food expenditure, PAL JEL classi cation: H42, D62, D12, O12, I38 Address: 579 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, (650) 492-0381. I am grateful to Giacomo De Giorgi, Luigi Pistaferri, and Seema Jayachandran for advice and suggestions, and Ned Augenblick, Ryan Lampe, and Carla Roa for helpful comments. This research was funded by the Leonard W. Ely and Shirley R. Ely Graduate Student Fund Fellowship through the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
منابع مشابه
Testing Paternalism: Cash vs. In-kind Transfers
Welfare programs are often implemented in-kind to promote outcomes that might not be realized under cash transfers. This paper uses a randomized controlled trial of a governmental food assistance program to test whether this form of paternalism is necessary, comparing precisely measured consumption and health outcomes under both in-kind food and cash transfers. Importantly, households do not in...
متن کاملThis work is distributed as a Discussion Paper by the
Welfare programs are often implemented in-kind to promote outcomes that might not be realized under cash transfers. I use a randomized controlled trial of the Mexican governments Food Assistance Program (PAL) to test whether this form of paternalism is necessary, comparing precisely measured consumption and health outcomes under both inkind food and cash transfers. Importantly, I nd that ho...
متن کاملA healthier start: The effect of conditional cash transfers on neonatal and infant mortality in rural Mexico
متن کامل
Transfers in cash and in-kind: Theory meets the data
We review theoretical explanations for in-kind transfers in light of the limited empirical evidence. After reviewing the traditional paternalistic arguments, we consider explanations based on imperfect information and self-targeting. We then discuss the large literature on in-kind programs as a way of improving the efficiency of the tax system and a range of other possible explanations includin...
متن کاملConditional Cash Transfers for Maternal Health Interventions: Factors Influencing Uptake in North-Central Nigeria
Background Nigeria accounts for a significant proportion of global maternal mortality figures with little progress made in curbing poor health indices. In a bid to reverse this trend, the Government of Nigeria initiated a conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme to encourage pregnant women utilize services at designated health facilities. This study aims to understand experiences of women who ...
متن کامل